http: / / benedetticarlo.livejournal.com /
January 21, 2009 WEDNESDAY
News and Articles may be freely reproduced.
Please, however,
to respect the integrity and citing authors.
This space is not a journal as being updated but does not always reflect a precise frequency. It can not therefore be regarded as an editorial product under Law No 62, 7.03.2001
| Israeli war AGAINST THE GAZA STRIP: "I pain of childbirth A NEW PALESTINE AND A NEW MIDDLE EAST " Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya
To really understand the specific need to understand the general, and to master the knowledge of the general need to understand the specific. What is happening in the Palestinian Territories is related to what is happening throughout the Middle East and Central Asia, from Lebanon to Iraq and Afghanistan is headed by NATO, as part of a larger geo-strategic goal. All events in the Middle East make up a huge geopolitical puzzle: each piece gives only part of the picture, but putting together all these pieces you can see the whole picture. For this reason it is sometimes necessary to examine more than a single event to reach a better understanding of another event, even if sometimes it forces you to expand its range of observation. Operation Lead Time: the "birth pangs of a new Palestinian" Israeli attacks against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip are part of a broader geo-strategic project. According to Israel and the United States belong to the "birth pangs of a new Palestine and a new Middle East". But this project will not develop as predicted the United States and Israel. Throughout the Middle East and the Arab World have been covered by a wind of change. This process is unleashing a new wave of popular resistance directed against the United States and Israel in the Arab World and beyond. The Israeli aim is to "internationalize" the Gaza Strip following the example of South Lebanon, in such a way that requires the intervention of NATO and other foreign military forces as so-called peacekeepers. [1] This modus operandi is very similar to the Anglo-American occupied Iraq and Afghanistan manned. The former Yugoslavia is a significant case in which a process of political and economic restructuring (including privatization program) was implemented under the supervision of U.S. troops and NATO. The difference in the Palestinian Territories is that political figures are willing to implement these plans, as Mahmoud Abbas, are already in office. Arab Peace Initiative of 2002 to the Annapolis Conference The events in question begin with the Initiative 2002 Arab that was proposed by Saudi Arabia to Beirut during an Arab League conference in Lebanon. The initiative of Saudi Arabia was in fact from London and Washington and was part of an Anglo-American political agenda for the Middle East and the so-called Project for the "New Middle East". divide the Palestinians by Hamas-Fatah rift Israel, America and its allies, including the European Union, knew that Hamas would never have been complicit in what Washington had in mind for the Palestinians and the Middle East. In short, Hamas would oppose the project for the "New Middle East". This restructuring of the geopolitics of the Middle East requires the concomitant creation of a Mediterranean Union. The Arab Peace Initiative in 2002 was the prelude is the materialization of the "New Middle East" to its implementation through the Mediterranean Union. Act II : Trap Palestinians with the Mecca agreement and through the West Bank-Gaza split was after the signing of the Mecca that elements within Fatah led by Mohammed Dahlan (and under the supervision of Lieutenant General Keith Dayton, U.S.) received from the United States and Israel to reverse the order dall'Hamas led Palestinian government. Probably there were two plans, one for the possible success of Fatah and the other (emergency, and the most likely of the two) in the event of failure. This plan called for two parallel Palestinian governments, one in Gaza guidato dal Primo Ministro Haniyeh e dall'Hamas e l'altro in Cisgiordania controllato da Mahmoud Abbas e dal Fatah. L'obiettivo di Israele e Stati Uniti era trasformare la Striscia di Gaza e la Gisgiordania in due differenti identità politiche sotto due amministrazioni molto diverse. Con la cessazione dei combattimenti Hamas-Fatah nella Striscia di Gaza gli israeliani cominciarono a parlare di una “soluzione a tre nazioni”. With Hamas effectively neutralized and expelled from power in the West Bank, everything was ready for the next two steps: the proposal to send an international military force in the Palestinian Territories and the Annapolis Conference. [3] the agreement in principle and the Israeli-Palestinian peace conference in Annapolis Before the Annapolis Conference between Mahmoud Abbas and Israel were drawn up of "agreements in principle" to ensure that the Palestinians would not possessed a military force if the West Bank had been granted some form of self-determination policy. The agreements also call for integration between the economies of the Arab World and Israel and the positioning of an international force, similar to those fielded by NATO in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo, to supervise the implementation of these agreements in the Palestinian Territories . The objective was to neutralize Hamas and legitimize Mahmoud Abbas. Act IV : come full circle, returning to the Arab of Saudi Arabia in 2002. The peoples of the Middle East must open their eyes to what was thought to their lands. The agreement in principle, the Arab Peace Initiative and the Annapolis Conference are all means to achieve the same end. All three, like Israel itself, are rooted in the plans for economic hegemony in the Middle East. It is time to consider the proposal by Nicolas Sarkozy for a Mediterranean Union. Integration Economic Israeli economy with the economies of the Arab World will further promote the global network of tight global agents of the Washington Consensus [a term coined by economist John Williamson in 1989 to define a set of directives addressed to countries afflicted DEVELOPING by the economic crisis from the Washington-based institutions like the IMF, the World Bank and the Department of the Treasury of the United States the term is then passed to identify the lack of autonomy of international economic institutions against the American superpower, NdT ]. The Arab Peace Initiative of 2002, the agreement in principle and Annapolis are all phases of the constitution economic integration of the Arab World with Israel through the project for the "New Middle East" and the integration of the Mediterranean with the European Union via the Mediterranean Union. The presence of troops from NATO member countries and the European Union in Lebanon are also part of this plan. Towards the establishment of a Palestinian dictatorship: other plans are under way to oust the Hamas? Israeli attacks on Gaza Strip and the Palestinian people are an attack on democracy and freedom of choice. Israel, the United States, Saudi Arabia and its allies have not been slow to recognize Mahmoud Abbas as the legitimate leader of the Palestinians even though his term had ended. Despite The Palestinian Territories are no exception. The United States, Israel, its allies and corrupt oligarchs at the top of Fatah are determined to establish an autocratic regime in the Palestinian Territories. For the satisfaction of the Israeli and American strategists, the Hamas-Fatah rift has helped to curb the democratic path taken by the Palestinians through the election of their leadership and paved the way for attempts to establish future Palestinian government compliant. In Cigiordania the process has already begun. At the end of 2008, Hamas had made it clear that it intended to present its own candidate for President of the Palestinian elections which were held in January 2009. It was a direct challenge to the power held by Mahmoud Abbas and the leaders of Fatah by controlling the presidency of the Palestinian Authority. Before the Israeli attacks against Gaza Mahmoud Abbas and Fatah had replied curtly all'Hamas that such an election would not be held until the Hamas had not waived its power in the hands of Mahmoud Abbas, Prime Minister and Government of the Palestinian West Bank, Mahmoud Abbas has chosen placing itself outside the democratic process. dall'Hamas led government in Gaza has since replied that would appeal Palestinian legal code. The Palestinian law stipulates that in such situations, the role and duties of the President should be transferred to the President of the Palestinian Legislative Council, the parliament of the Palestinians, for a period of transition. The current president of the Palestinian Legislative Council Ahmed Bahar, a member dell'Hamas. Related to this move to oust the Hamas there are broader geopolitical and strategic initiatives to surround and confront Syria and Iran. [7] Israel, with the help of Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia, had tried for months to negotiate a unilateral ceasefire with the Palestinian government led by Hamas in the Gaza Strip. This move was launched in parallel with initiatives toward Israel, Hezbollah, Lebanon and Syria. These Israeli initiatives are a means to dismantle and dissolve the Resistance Bloc, a coalition of nation states and non-state actors who oppose the occupation and foreign control in the Middle East. This category includes, among others, the Arab resistance movements in occupied Iraq by the Anglo-Americans, the Palestinian Territories and Lebanon. He challenged the Washington Consensus and economic reconfiguration of the Middle East that is implemented through actions such as the Anglo-American invasion and occupation of Iraq. Tel Aviv was a deadlock in negotiations with Hamas and now seems to favor the establishment of autocratic administration of Fatah in the Gaza Strip who diligently obey the edicts Israelis. This also would free Israel from the need to deal with Lebanon, Syria and / or Iran. The Final Act: The power of the people, the act has not yet gone to the scene. The breaches at the Rafah border between Egypt and the Gaza Strip were a sign that the tyranny was falling apart, but there is still much way to go. [8] The mass protests around the world, from Egypt and the Arab World and Asia are a signal that the "second superpower" - the power of the people - are raising their heads. At the end people will decide against the interests of politicians and their economic schemers. People are able to look beyond nationality, ethnic divisions and the boundaries drawn by man. He believes in justice and equality for all and suffers when he sees others suffer, regardless of differences. In the world the just and honest constitute a nation in itself - whether Israeli or Arab or American - and their choices will determine the direction of the future. [3] Emine Kart, Ankara cool Towards Palestine troops, Today's Zaman, July 3, 2007 [4] Jamal Al-Majaida, Discusses NATO chief alliance's role in Gulf, Khaleej Times, January 27, 2008. [5] Avi Isaacharoff, PA chief of staff: We Must Be Ready to Use Force Against Hamas control of Gaza to Tahe, Haaretz, September 22, 2008. [7] Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya, Beating the Drums of a Broader Middle East War, Center for Reseach on Globalization (CRG), May 6, 2008. [8] A few days after the opening of the Rafah crossing, Mahmoud Abbas, the Israeli government and the Egyptian government have urged the armed Fatah because it acquires control of the crossing point and shut the transit of Palestinians. Not only does this show that none of these players care about the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip, but also illustrates that Mahmoud Abbas has no concern for the welfare of the Palestinians. The Rafah crossing has become a force that involves the observation of the European Union, the European Union as an accomplice of the oppression of the Palestinians. |
REVIEW EASTERN
Our focus is on the themes of the East,
former Soviet Union, China and countries that were included in the work of Comecon, the economic community of the so-called socialist camp.
We always open a window on events and on major events involving Italy and the world at large
SERBIA E KOSOVO
WHAT HAPPENS AND WHAT 'HAPPENED
Exit now in the editions of this book Noctuaedizioni Stephen Vernon entitled "The question of Serbia and the Kosovo crisis." The book is 192 pages and price is 18 €. Despite the presence of an international army of interposition, the so-called Kosovo Liberation Army has taken steps to expel from Kosovo and Metohija almost all non-Albanian minorities (about 20% of current residents), that is 240,000 people of Serbian, Montenegrin, Turkish, Roma, Jewish, Egyptian, Gorani (ie Slav-Islamization) Croatian and Albanian (some belonging to that community were in fact considered "collaborators" in Belgrade, according to figures provided by KFOR spokesman Ole Irgens, of the 130 people abducted in just the first five months of international administration, at least 40 Albanians would be).
Of these, only a few hundred Serbs have so far failed to return, supported by the strong attachment that always ties them to their land, but in the south of Kosmet are forced to live in small enclaves under constant siege.
The situation of heightened tension, however, is that of the city Kosovska Mitrovica in the north, where the Serb community is more numerous and the French contingent that oversees the bridge over the Ibar River separates it from the Albanian majority.
the humanitarian tragedy of the refugees, we must add the destruction of 150 Orthodox churches and religious sites, a profound loss not only for Serbian culture but throughout medieval Christendom.
Under the pressure of the western part of the international community, that is much more the United States of the European Union, the Albanian government in Pristina unilaterally proclaimed February 17, 2008 its independence from the rest of Serbia.
This process of secession, however, is extremely difficult to be legitimized by the United Nations, where the Russian-Chinese veto blocks the entrance of the new state of Kosovo in all multilateral organizations, diplomatic missions, for which the awards are made only at the initiative of individual nations.
remain also on the table all the dangers of a possible "domino effect" that the statement of 17 February is likely to trigger, not only in the Balkan peninsula but also in the rest of Europe.