15 November to 15 December 2010 The Return of the initiative in 2009 that made it possible to give a smile, a critical profit or a quiver of satisfaction to the authors who received more than seven hundred reviews in three months. Join the wild party of the comment and win prizes in return!
Rules another banner name, autumn-winter, with stitching, alloy wheels and finishing prestige.
3) Banner additional Special Merit (maybe) be defined later, autumn-winter collection with metal inserts and serial number printed.
Glory, honor, and junk masterlist of this kind may be provided after the fact ... indeed, an idea in the first edition (with another name and other details)
has reached 736 comments on a rather long period of time (three months), so we want to raise a target: If you arrive in
300 comments
in this edition, we will give a special prize ! Note: No animal, vegetable or mineral will be skinned, peeled, crushed or dissected for the realization of the banners. We will use the freedom to slavery administration. \\ O /
How does it work?
4) You must be registered to LiveJournal (you here if you have not already) and be members of our community (so
here if you have not already). If you want to - but not required, just strongly recommended - you can follow
maridichallenge adding it to your friends list (so
here if you have not already): You can follow all updates to the community and be informed about extensions, upgrades, communications and new initiatives from your friends list
. 5) are valid for the initiative regulations to all comments on any stories archive, public, issues or personnel, provided that it is possible to verify the existence and history of the review to which it relates.
6) Definition of regulatory comment: nothing bellixima "and nothing more, nothing sarcastic criticism (teasing of various types) or sarcazzista (in no logical sense), a minimum wage beyond the Squee . Yes reasoned criticism of any kind, so to comment enthusiastic if not single-row, so long as the slating polite and reasoned. 7) To be valid, the comment must contain one of the following MUST the bottom of the text (no link, so as not to contravene the rules of the reference site):
-
[2 for the Autumn Tests maridichallenge]
-
[This review is involved in the Autumn Tests 2 - The Vintage @ maridichallenge] - "Comment participant in the Autumn Tests on maridichallenge 2."
- any expression equivalent to the previous quote "Autumn Tests 2" and "maridichallenge.
8) Unlike the first edition, there is no difference between responses to stories with many, few or no comments, stories or between one or more chapters. There is no limit to the number of stories by the same author that you can review.
9) Every comment is worth 1 point
independently from those characteristic of the history, it is not possible to count more comments to the same story (eg comments to each chapter) - in this case will be valid for any comment on the story itself, it is not can re-comment on a story already commented previously in this initiative. On reaching 10, 20 or 50 comments (other defined thresholds if and when we get there), you will be eligible for a banner name.
How do I report a count of reviews?
10)
At this link you will find a handy script to be filled every time you want to mark a review. Follow the simple instructions (this is to place your nickname on LiveJournal, fandom and the title of the story, and a link to the comment that you left). IT MUST BE THE NICKNAME
lowercase, just like on LiveJournal. HE PUT THE CAPS DO JUMP THE SCRIPT THAT THERE will count 'comments.
The script requires the use of a special
verification code that is available - only for members
maridichallenge
- on this page. FAQ - It 's possible to comment on stories in a foreign language. In this case, of course, also translate the word - and if you want, explain what it means to the hapless author scrittina. XD
- It 's possible to comment on stories as commented by others for the Autumn Tests, regardless of the edition. (If you had commented
, is of course forbidden.)
- Comments collections worth more than a point only if the stories contained in them are truly independent. - If you are sure that the store in which published the story
not prevent /
admits the use of a link to MDC, you are perfectly free to add further to explain where it rained the review. (Ex. EFP prohibit it, so do not you dare.)